Monday, December 20, 2010

Genetic Testing for AMD is here Today

by:Diana Shechtman OD FAAO & Steven Ferrucci OD FAAO

Age-Related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive disease and the leading cause of vision loss among the elderly, affecting central vision required for daily activities such as driving and reading. There are a number of factors affecting AMD, such as advanced age, smoking, UV exposure, overall health (that contribute to high blood pressure, obesity, diet) and family history. Many factors may be modified and yet others like genetics cannot. Although AMD may seem to be hereditary in some families and not others, genetics have been shown to contribute significantly to the disease. Multiple twin and sibling studies have collaborated to the familial nature of the disease. First-degree relatives of patients with AMD are at a significantly increased risk for the disease. Furthermore, large epidemiological studies have suggested a strong genetic risk factor for AMD. In fact, the risk of developing AMD increases 4 fold among patients with a positive family history. In 2005 a breakthrough occurred in the area of genetic research and AMD; Klein and associates discovered a strong link between AMD and certain genetic variants. Similarly, numerous other genes have been implicated in AMD, which may increase the risk of AMD up to 70%.
Until recently there was no test to help determined patient’s inherited risk for AMD. Today, Macula Risk (ArcticDX, Toronto, Ontario) is a genetic test specifically designed to determine genetic predisposition to AMD and vision loss attributed to the more advanced stage of the disease.
Macula Risk  genetic test separates individuals into one of 5 macula risk (MR) categories, with MR 3 through 5 representing an increased risk for the more advance stage of the disease. This accounts for approximately 20% of the general population. MR1 has less than a 5% risk of the advanced stage of the disease, while MR 5 carries greater than 55% risk. These results can aid the doctor in devising a specific management plan and follow-up protocol in order to reassure early intervention to prevent vision loss.
The test only requires a simple in-office cheek swab, which is sent directly to the genetic lab. The report includes test results and written genetic support information (including access to genetic counseling). Macula Risk genetic testing is covered by most insurance providers, including Medicare, as long as the specific diagnosis (ICD-9) are identified by the doctor. The prognostic genetic test is intended for patients who have a diagnosis of early or intermediate AMD. Thus, the “at risk patient,” would have to pay a fee for the test.
Despite our best efforts and new treatment options available today, many people are still losing vision from AMD. New advancements in the area of AMD are becoming an integral part in preventing future visual deterioration. AMD is affected by both environmental and genetic factors that interact with one another to determine prevalence and progression of the disease. Furthermore, at this time we do not know all of the genes linked to AMD. Hence, genetic testing in the area of AMD is only a risk indicator and cannot predict “without a shadow of a doubt,” which patients will and which will not develop the disease. However, this test provides a genetic profile screening to help identify those at risk as well as aids in tailoring a distinct management approach for those with the disease. With various researches devoted to treatment options for AMD, genetic testing in the area of AMD is at the frontier of providing crucial information.
REFERENCES
1. Swaroop, Branham KE, Chen W, Abecasis G. Genetic susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration: a paradigm for dissecting complex disease traits. Hum Mol Genet 2007; 16: 174-82.
2. Klein ML, Mauldin WM, Stoumbos VD. Heredity and age-related macular degeneration. Observations in monozygotic twins. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112: 932-7.
3. Meyers SM, Greene T, Gutman FA. A twin study of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 120: 757-66.
4. Heiba IM, Elston RC, Klein BE, et al. Sibling correlations and segregation analysis of age-related maculopathy: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Genet Epidemiol. 1994; 11: 51-67.
5. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Assink JJ, et al. Genetic risk of age-related maculopathy. Population-based familial aggregation study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116: 1646-51.
6. Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Mitchell BD. Familial aggregation of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 123: 199-206.
7. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, et al. Complement Factor H Polymorphism in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Science 2005; 308: 385-389.
8. Seddon JM, Reynolds R, Maller J, Fagerness JA, Daly MJ, Rosner B. Prediction model for prevalence and incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration based on genetic, demographic, and environmental variables. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50 (65): 2044-53.
9. www.macularisk.com/en/physicians/order.html (accessed Dec. 14th , 2010)

1 comment:

Zac Denning said...

This is now a controversial topic. A growing number of experts are cautioning that there's insufficient evidence for use of zinc-free, and other AREDS supplements 'tailored' to patient genetic profiles.

Citing the limited and possibly flawed data from a study by Dr. Carl Awh et al. (funded by MacularRisk), used as rational for these customizations, the National Eye Institute has indicated that it would be premature for eye practitioners to recommend such supplements.

In a presentation at the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) meeting this past November, NEI spokesperson and lead AREDS researcher Emily Chew, MD pointed out that studies to date on this topic have produced conflicting results, with an earlier AREDS analysis (Klein et al, 2008) finding zinc to have either benefit or no effect (but no harm) across all genetic profiles. Dr. Chew pointed out several specific flaws in the Awh et al. study.

Currently, no one has clinically tested different nutritional treatments for specific genetic profiles in a controlled clinical trial. Emily Chew, MD, in a Retina Today article (http://bmctoday.net/retinatoday/2013...-amd-continues) states that the retrospective analyses conducted thus far are insufficient to shape clinical guidelines.

There is certainly an argument to be made for genetic testing - and each practitioner must weight the benefits and drawbacks. However, the American Academy of Ophthalmology Expert Panel on Genetics is now advising against the use of genetic testing for patients with AMD and other complex eye diseases until further research is done.

For more information and links to the AAO statement on genetic testing, see the following link: http://www.sbh.com/genetic

(or: http://www.sciencebasedhealth.com/genetic)